USPTO serial 75600887
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE P KRAMER
LESLIE P KRAMER DORR CARSSON SLOAN & BIRNEY PC3010 E 6TH AVEDENVER, CO 80206UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring electronic goods, furniture, household appliances, personal care goods, patio goods, gardening goods, toys, games, and sporting goods; computerized ordering and on-line retail distributorship services featuring electronic goods, furniture, household appliances, patio goods, gardening goods, toys, games, and sporting goods; promoting the goods and services of others by means of designing, creating, hosting, maintaining, operating, and managing the web sites of others, and by means of processing orders for others, and by disseminating advertising for others via a global computer network; and business management consultation | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1996 |
| 036 | Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1996 |
| 042 | Designing, creating, hosting, maintaining, operating, and managing the web sites of others; computer consultation, namely, consulting in the field of designing, creating, hosting, maintaining, operating, and managing of web sites | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |