USPTO serial 75601657
MEETINGS ON THE NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 27, 2001
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEETINGS ON THE NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RUTHERFORD, NJ
RUTHERFORD, NJ
RUTHERFORD, NJ
RUTHERFORD, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen C. Werner, Jr.
MARK R FARRIS WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK SC555 E WLS ST STE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3819UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Business interaction services, namely, audio teleconferencing and video teleconferencing via the global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BENKOVICH, JAY
- Other trademarks owned by BENKOVICH, JAY
- Other trademarks owned by ECKERT, NANCY
- Other trademarks owned by ECKERT, NANCY
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named MEETINGS ON THE NET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 7, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |