USPTO serial 75601670
REMIND.RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2796436Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2003
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REMIND.RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO ONTARIO M2N 6K8, CA
TORONTO ONTARIO M2N 6K8, CA
TORONTO ONTARIO M2N 6K8, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara L. Onofrio
Joshua S. Broitman` Ostrager Chong Flaherty & Broitman P.C.570 Lexington Avenue, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING CLIENT/PATIENT SUPPORT SERVICES TO DOCTORS, PHARMACIES AND PHARMACISTS NAMELY, AN INTERACTIVE TELEPHONE NETWORK USED TO TRACK AND SCHEDULE THE MEDICATION OF CLIENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOUCHLOGIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TOUCHLOGIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TOUCHLOGIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TELELINK CALL MANAGEMENT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named REMIND.RX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |