USPTO serial 75601762
CITRICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITRICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OUTSOURCING SERVICES GROUP LLC
WOODCLIFF LAKE, NJ
FRIDLEY, MN
FRIDLEY, MN
FRIDLEY, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA M. BYRNE
SANDRA EPP RYAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations and skin care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OUTSOURCING SERVICES GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Tiro Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tiro Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TIRO INDUSTRIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CITRICINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |