USPTO serial 75601798
FUNDUS ROBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUNDUS ROBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Hyde
ROBERT A HYDE NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS721 RT 202-206PO BOX 1018SOMERVILLE, NJ 08876Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Diagnostic non-invasive optical apparatus for viewing and producing images of interior portions of the eye | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |