USPTO serial 75602006
HUMAN VALUES INTEGRITY INNOVATIVE SOLUTION VALUE FOR MONEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2498704Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2001
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUMAN VALUES INTEGRITY INNOVATIVE SOLUTION VALUE FOR MONEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bangalore - 560 001, IN
Bangalore - 560 001, IN
Bangalore - 560 001, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
Bruce S. Londa Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.875 Third Avenue 18th FloorNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of computer hardware, computer programming, maintenance of computer software, updating of computer software, computer software design, computer systems analysis and integration, recovering of computer data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wipro Investment Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Wipro Investment Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Wipro Investment Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HUMAN VALUES INTEGRITY INNOVATIVE SOLUTION VALUE FOR MONEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 13, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |