Drawing for CELTICS

USPTO serial 75602007

CELTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CADY, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CELTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATHRYN BARRETT PARK

NBA PROPERTIES, INCOLYMPIC TWR BLDG 645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Athletic bags, shoe bags for travel, overnight bags, umbrellas, backpacks, baby backpacks, duffel bags, tote bags, luggage, luggage tags, patio umbrellas, valises, attache cases, billfolds, wallets, briefcases, business card cases, book bags, all purpose sport bags, golf umbrellas, gym bags, purses, fanny packs, waist packs, cosmetic cases sold empty, garment bags for travel, handbags, key cases, knapsacks, suitcases, toiletry cases sold empty, trunks for traveling and rucksacksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 13, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 13, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 2, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 23, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 29, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 9, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 22, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance