Drawing for POWERED BY E-STAMP THE INTERNET POSTAGECOMPANY

USPTO serial 75602098

POWERED BY E-STAMP THE INTERNET POSTAGECOMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERED BY E-STAMP THE INTERNET POSTAGECOMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Tannenbaum

DAVID H TANNENBAUM FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP2200 ROSS AVESTE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
ACOMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance