USPTO serial 75602149
CHARLES LAFITTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2001
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHARLES LAFITTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE, SUCCESSEUR DE GEORGE GOULET, MAISON FONDEE EN 1834
Tours sur Marne, FR
Epernay, FR
51200 EPERNAY, FR
51200 EPERNAY, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
Denise I. Mroz Woodcock Washburn LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, champagne wines, [ cognac and brandies ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE, SUCCESSEUR DE GEORGE GOULET, MAISON FONDEE EN 1834
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE
- Other trademarks owned by CHAMPAGNE CHARLES LAFITTE
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CHARLES LAFITTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |