USPTO serial 75602193
IDENTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDENTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
SUSAN M BELIVEAU A BC V1Y 8C7BISHOP & COMPANYSTE 206 CENTURY PL 347 LEON AVE KELOWNKELOWNA, BC V1Y 8C7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS NAMELY, RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION TAGS AND BAR CODE STRIPS, ELECTRONIC DATA COLLECTION READERS FOR READING, COLLECTING AND MANIPULATING DATA CONTAINED IN THE RADIO FREQUENCY TAGS AND BAR CODE STRIPS, FOR USE IN MATERIALS HANDLING, WAREHOUSING, TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |