USPTO serial 75602221
INVESTING THE WAY IT SHOULD BE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVESTING THE WAY IT SHOULD BE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHANNA F SISTEK
ROBERTA CAIRNEY SF 88KNY 05-105CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC101 MONTGOMERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | brokerage services in the fields of financial securities, stocks, bonds, money market funds, mutual funds, commodities, futures, stock options, and indices of financial securities; investment services in the fields of financial securities, stocks, bonds, money market funds, mutual funds, commodities, futures, options, and indices of financial securities; investment advice and management in the fields of financial securities, options stocks, bonds, money market funds, mutual funds, commodities, futures, stock options, and indices of financial securities; securities brokerage account services that feature an interest bearing feature for cash between investments, electronic cash transactions, margin loan services; credit card and debit card services; check processing and bill payment services; annuity investment services; financial investment in the in the field of variable insurance; financial information provided by electronic means; administration of employee pension plans; financial planning; insurance brokerage; cash management account services; fixed income investment services; electronic funds transfer; providing information and analysis in the fields of finance, economics, investment, business, financial planning, and investment strategy; providing portfolio management services; providing an interactive online computer database in the field of financial portfolio management, financial decision making, investment research, monitoring investment value and performance of investments, analyzing investment performance, evaluating asset allocation, risk tolerance, financial alternative plans and investment time frames; providing information by phone and by online means in the field of investment account information and financial research; providing an online computer database in the fields of investing, finance, financial planning, financial news, financial information, and analysis in the fields of investing, finance, and financial planning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INVESTING THE WAY IT SHOULD BE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |