USPTO serial 75602243
BIO-TECHS A/Y
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2652164Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2002
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIO-TECHS A/Y?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75013 PARIS, FR
75013- PARIS, FR
75013- PARIS, FR
75013- PARIS, FR
F-75013 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations for use as active ingredients or materials in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 1999 |
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, skin emulsions, skin lotions, toilet creams, cold creams, skin milk, skin fresheners, massage gels, non-medicated body refining fluid for the reduction of orange peel skin, non-medicated lipo-reducing complex for topical use, non-medicated sanitary preparations, namely, soaps, lotions, creams and oils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 1999 |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations, namely, [ derinatological ] * dermatological * preparations, sanitary preparations, namely, soaps, lotions, creams and oils for the care and nourishment of the skin, body refining fluid for the reduction of orange peel skin and for medical use, lipo-reducing complex for topical use and for medical use; dietetic substances for medical use, namely for body refining | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI-AVENTIS
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI-SYNTHELABO
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI-SYNTHELABO
- Other trademarks owned by SANOFI-SYNTHELABO
- Other trademarks owned by Sanofi
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BIO-TECHS A/Y
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |