Drawing for MOMENTUM, THE FASTEST WAY TO FREE

USPTO serial 75602267

MOMENTUM, THE FASTEST WAY TO FREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOMENTUM, THE FASTEST WAY TO FREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT& DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROMOTING THE USE OF CREDIT CARD AND PRIVATE LABEL CARD ACCOUNTS AND THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION OF INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS VIA CREDIT CARD REGISTRATIONACTIVEJan 16, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 1, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 20, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 17, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance