Drawing for JUST GRAPEFRUIT

USPTO serial 75602462

JUST GRAPEFRUIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUST GRAPEFRUIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032non-alcoholic and non-carbonated fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates non-alcoholic and non-carbonated fruit drinks and fruit drink concentrates non-alcoholic and carbonated fruit drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 24, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance