USPTO serial 75602873
FLASH DARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLASH DARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Middleburgh, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | pants, overalls, shorts, culottes, dresses, skirts | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |