Drawing for HOLLY RIBBONS

USPTO serial 75602902

HOLLY RIBBONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLLY RIBBONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott K. Haight

SCOTT K HAIGHT GARRISON MORRIS & HAIGHT, PLLC5100 POPLAR AVE STE 2100MEMPHIS, TN 38137UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Gummed tape; advertisement boards of paper or cardboard; calendars; tear-off calendars; diaries; announcement cards; postcards; greeting cards; graphic prints; graphic reproductions; posters; notebooks; book markers; wrappers; wrapping paper; packing paper; boxes of cardboard or paper; charts; mats for glasses of paper, plastic or cork; document files; envelopes; folders; folders for papers; loose leaf binders; stationery; pads; stationery paper sheets; writing pads; drawing pads; stencils; blueprints; printed forms; embroidery designs; place mats of paper; table cloths of paper; table linen of paper; table napkins of paper; towels of paper; blinds of paper; wood-pulp board; flower pot covers of paper; labels not of textile; picturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Feb 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 10, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 19, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance