USPTO serial 75603198
HARMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. SLALTERY
JAMES M SLALTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH, LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, cervical spatulas, disposable scalpels, amniotic membrane perforators, pre-operative scrub brushes, umbilical cord clamps and urine sample containers; measuring, monitoring and checking apparatus and instruments, namely, exhaler for therapeutic use to monitor lung functions at peak expiration flow rate in people; medical instruments for administering medicine, namely, pacifiers for babies and cups and spoons for the administering of medicine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |