USPTO serial 75603331
INFOPULSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFOPULSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Best 5683 AG, NL
Best 5683 AG, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. JOHN CAMPAIGN
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PCTHE BAR BLDG36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMUNICATION APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES, INFORMATION AND DATA | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | AUTOMATION SERVICES DESIGNED FOR CLIENT E-COMMERCE AND E-BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FOR THIRD PARTIES, NAMELY, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN RELATION TO STOCK EXCHANGES, ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT, ELECTRONIC BANKING, ELECTRONIC SECURITY, AND ALL OTHER RELATED SUBJECTS IN RELATION TO ELECTRONIC BROKERAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, PARTICULARLY SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH WEBSITES AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK APPLICATIONS; DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; SERVICES OF AUTOMATION EXPERTS DESIGNED FOR CLIENT E-COMMERCE AND E-BUSINESS SOLUTIONS FOR THIRD PARTIES, NAMELY, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPUTER SYSTEM INTEGRATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infopulse B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Infopulse B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INFOPULSE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |