USPTO serial 75603342
SHHH BY VICTORIA'S SECRET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHHH BY VICTORIA'S SECRET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Colucci,
FRANK J COLUCCI, COLUCCI & UMANSMANHATTAN TWR101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal care products, cosmetics and fragrances, namely, body creams, body lotions, bubble bath, bath oils, body dusting powder, cologne, face soap, hand soap, body soap all sold only in applicant's licensee's retail stores and through its licensee's catalog | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |