USPTO serial 75603463
MOBILESUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILESUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanagawa 211, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Halsey, Jr.
DAVID M PITCHER STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING E-MAIL AND FACSIMILE MESSAGES, FOR MAINTAINING, SEARCHING AND ORGANIZING ADDRESS BOOKS AND SCHEDULES OF INFORMATION, FOR CREATING, EDITING AND SEARCHING TEXT DATA AND IMAGE DATA, AND FOR TRANSFORMING SUCH INFORMATION AND DATA WITH PAGERS, CELLULAR PHONES, HANDHELD COMPUTERS, NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS AND OTHER PERSONAL COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |