USPTO serial 75604018
ACTIVE DMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE DMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACEY R HALPERN
STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLPNEWPORT CTR620 NEWPORT CTR DR FL 16NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6420Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely computer software for use in computer network directory management, including-- administration, security, migration, domain reconfiguration, policy enforcement and management, conventions and standards management, reporting and auditing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |