USPTO serial 75604501
CXO NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2751467Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2003
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CXO NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, RELATING TO COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
| 041 | PROVISION OF ONLINE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, RELATING TO COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |