USPTO serial 75604733
MILLENNIUM HELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIUM HELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren S. Cahr
DARREN S CAHR GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS LLCSTE 3700191 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1698Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books, pamphlets, manuals, newsletters, brochures, magazines and guides, all for the foregoing in the fields of entertainment and education, featuring dramas, comedies, action and adventure stories, and docudramas, sports, science, culture, history, geography, mathematics, literature, social studies, archeology, and zoology, and reference materials related thereto; posters, bumper stickers, decals and credit cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |