USPTO serial 75604770
ROAMONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROAMONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP NORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST N WSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK VIA TELEPHONE CONNECTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION OF GENERAL CONSUMER INTEREST TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING PRIVATE CORPORATE AND INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING AN INSTITUTION'S BUSINESS OPERATIONS TO ITS EMPLOYEES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |