Drawing for PACKET PORT

USPTO serial 75604777

PACKET PORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKET PORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.

MICHAEL D HOBBS JR TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPNATIONSBANK PLZ 600 PEACHTREE STNE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009network interface units for voice and high-speed data services through a cable network, namely, global computer network, telephone, video, and cable servicesACTIVEJun 24, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 9, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance