USPTO serial 75604906
EVERTREK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERTREK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | OUTERWEAR, NAMELY COATS, DOWN JACKET, ANORAKS, RAIN SUITS AND RAIN SLICKERS, TOPS, NAMELY PULLOVER SWEAT HOODS, SWEATERS, KNITS, TEE-SHIRTS, BUTTON-UP SHIRTS, PULLOVER ZIP-NECKS AND RUGBYS, PANTS, NAMELY JEANS, SHORTS, COVER-ALLS, TWILLS PANTS, TROUSERS, KNICKERS PANTS, FARMERS PANTS AND SWEAT PANTS, HEADWEAR NAMELY HATS, DETACHABLE HOODS AND HEAD-WRAPS AND SCARVES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |