USPTO serial 75605175
PURPLE PRIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PURPLE PRIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD R. NISSLE
TOD R NISSLEPO BOX 55630PHOENIX, AZ 85078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TOWELS, CLOTH OR FABRIC FLAGS, CLOTH OR FABRIC BANNERS, AND CLOTH OR FABRIC PENNANTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |