USPTO serial 75605447
THE GLORY OF CREATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE GLORY OF CREATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN P KINDER
BRIAN P KINDER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLP200 OCEANGATE STE 1550LONG BEACH, CA 92860UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational entertainment services, namely, the production and presentation of plays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |