USPTO serial 75605594
ZIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Y J Kim
DANIEL Y J KIM FLESHNER & KIMP O BOX 221200CHANTILLY, VA 20153-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated downhole tools used for the drilling of oil and gas, namely, power operated drill bits, reamers, cutters, junk subs and debris catchers; power operated well cleaning downhole tools, namely, power operated wipers, scrapers, brush tools, polishers and scourers for maintaining a clean interior of a casing or liner within a well bore; power operated fluid filters for selectively filtering and removing solids from downhole fluids; power operated fluid circulators that cause downhole fluid to impact the interior of a casing or a liner within a well bore to provide a cleaning action and which select a path for fluid travel in a casing or a liner within a well bore; and power operated downhole tools for isolating zones or creating barriers in a well casings, namely, zonal isolation packers, mud packers, packer installers, inflatable packers and packer setters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |