USPTO serial 75605625
ROKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 2002
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent E. Seton
Kent E. Seton Seton & Associates8730 Wilshire Blvd.SUITE 400Beverly Hills, CA 90211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GOGGLE STRAPS AND GOGGLE STRAP REMOUNTS FOR MOTORCYCLE HELMETS; RACING HELMETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1986 |
| 016 | VINYL STICKERS USED AS SHROUD GRAPHIC KITS ON MOTORCYCLES, DIRT BIKES, FRONT AND REAR MOTORCYCLE FENDERS AND MOUNTAIN BICYCLE COMPONENTS, AND USED AS DIGITS AND DECALS ON MOTORCYCLE HELMETS; GRAPHIC KITS NAMELY DIE-CUT PERSONAL NAME STICKERS AND PRE-CUT NUMBER PLATE BACKGROUND STICKERS IN CUSTOM GRAPHIC DESIGNS; AND VINYL STICKERS TO BE IRONED ONTO GARMENTS, NAMELY RACING SHIRTS, PANTS, GLOVES, BOOTS, AND CHEST PROTECTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1986 |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, JACKETS, HATS, CAPS, SHORTS, RACING PANTS, RACING BOOTS, RACING JERSEYS, RACING BELTS, RACING HELMETS, RACING GLOVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roko Sports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Roko Sports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Roko Sports, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ROKO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 5, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |