USPTO serial 75605742
Serial No. 75605742
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75605742?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-69469 Weinheim, DE
D-69469 Weinheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward P. Kelly
EDWARD P KELLY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 5TH AVE FL 30NEW YORK, NY 10103-3198UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automotive exhaust pipes with sound absorbing lining | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electronic systems for noise reduction by sound signals radiated out-of-phase in noisy interiors whose major components are sensors for scanning the vibration as well as magnetic devices influenced by scanners, relays capable of producing counter vibration via a hydraulic fluid | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | covers mounted on motors, namely covers for vehicle construction as well as covers on automotive bodies, namely insulating capsules in the form of structural parts such as hoods, all for sound absorbing purposes; covers and shields with or without sound absorbing lining for use as parts of vehicles, namely hoods; resiling crossings between cars, namely metal railcar knuckle couplers | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | insulating products, namely membranes, double coated fabrics, rubberized fabrics for use in vehicle interiors and railway systems for insulation against sound, cold heat, shock, vibration, shaking, moisture and environmentally dangerous substances | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | protective roofings made of fabrics and foams being coated and impregnated with bitumen or bituminous substances | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | carpets for vehicles, namely, shaped or plain carpeting with flexible and/or still heavy coatings and with integrated dimensional foam articles for reducing noise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Freudenberg
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Freudenberg
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |