USPTO serial 75605814
GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPIVAK, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOOD HOUSEKEEPING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry S. Agdern
BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRIC COFFEE POTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | household and kitchen utensils and containers, namely, beverage glassware, strainers, garlic presses, cork screws, cutting boards, apple corers, teapots not of precious metal, non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal, salt shakers, butter dishes, gravy boats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |