Drawing for ICE BLOCKER

USPTO serial 75606050

ICE BLOCKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2495312Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2001
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICE BLOCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

MARKET PROMOTIONS LP3116 TREELINE DRMURRYSVILLE, PA 15668UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001liquid de-icing composition that prevents ice from forming on windowsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 20, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 2, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 7, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 8, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2000IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance