USPTO serial 75606060
CORE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cherie W. Blackburn
CHERIE W BLACKBURN NELSON MULLENS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH151 MEETING STSTE 500CHARLESTON, SC 29401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services, namely process reegineering and project management services all for the financial service industry, specifically capital market and asset management | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1998 |
| 042 | Computer automation services, namely platform automation for trading floor conversions and roll outs | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |