Drawing for IMRI TECHNOLOGY PARNTERS, BEYOND THE MILLENNIUM

USPTO serial 75606182

IMRI TECHNOLOGY PARNTERS, BEYOND THE MILLENNIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IMRI TECHNOLOGY PARNTERS, BEYOND THE MILLENNIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DeAnne H. Ozaki

DEANNE H OZAKI PAUL, HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP555 S FLOWER ST23RD FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION AND PLANNING; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; AND EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING AND RECRUITMENTACTIVEJun 1, 1998
037INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; AND INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMSACTIVEJun 1, 1998
041COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICES, EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONSACTIVEJun 1, 1998
042TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER CONSULTATION; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVEJun 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 29, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance