USPTO serial 75606567
ORALSOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORALSOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Strongsville, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Cornely
JOHN P CORNELY FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | topical preparations for the treatment of dental, periodontal, or stomatic disorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | dental instruments, namely delivery appliances which allow topical preparations for the treatment of dental, periodontal, or stomatic disorders to remain in contact with the area being treated | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |