Drawing for ORALSOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 75606567

ORALSOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORALSOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Cornely

JOHN P CORNELY FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005topical preparations for the treatment of dental, periodontal, or stomatic disordersACTIVE—
010dental instruments, namely delivery appliances which allow topical preparations for the treatment of dental, periodontal, or stomatic disorders to remain in contact with the area being treatedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 25, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 29, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 16, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 13, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 10, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance