USPTO serial 75606570
HAWAII AMERICAN WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2001
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HAWAII AMERICAN WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
Camden, NJ
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
Voorhees, NJ
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
Voorhees, NJ
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN M. BOVARD
KEVIN M. BOVARD BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP2929 Arch StreetCira Centre, 12th FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Utility services, namely, providing [ water and ] sewer service | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named HAWAII AMERICAN WATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |