Drawing for FULL FAT FLAVOR

USPTO serial 75606578

FULL FAT FLAVOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FULL FAT FLAVOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harriet E Perkins

HARRIET E PERKINS SEIDEL. GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO. PCSTE 1 800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029nuts; peanut butter; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; dairy-based dips; potato chips; salad dressing; meat; poultry; seafood; processed fruits; processed vegetables; soups; margarine substitutes; butter and butter substitutes; cheese and cheese substitutes; dairy-based food beverages; nut toppings; fruit toppings; non-dairy whipped toppingsACTIVE—
030chocolate, candy, chocolate powder, cocoa powder and blended cocoa powders, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate syrup, chocolate based fillings, vanilla based fillings, chocolate food beverages not being diary-based or vegetable-based, chocolate chips, peanut butter confectionary chips, chocolate covered peanut butter cups, ice cream, ice milk, frozen yogurt, cakes, pies, cookies, crackers, processed grains, bakery goods, breads, flavoring syrup, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate and chocolate compound coating for molded bars and nutrition bars (as well as enrobed bars) and hollow molded chocolate candy and chocolate covered fruits and raisins, candied nuts, grain based snack bars, nut based snack bars, frozen confections, hot chocolate, vanilla, pasta, saucesACTIVE—
032soft drinks; syrups and blended syrups for making soft drinks; syrups and blended syrups for making chocolate beverage including chocolate cola and cola beverages; syrups for making vanilla beverages; syrups for making fruit beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance