Drawing for INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GOLD

USPTO serial 75606758

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANICE W. HOUSEY, Esq.

ANN K FORD PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING; MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER FILES AND COMPUTER DATA BASESACTIVE—
042LEASING OF ACCESS TIME TO A DATA BASE SERVER CENTER; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF USE AND OPERATION OF COMPUTERIZED DATA BASES; CREATION AND DESIGN OF SOFTWARE FOR FAST ACCESS TO COMPUTERIZED DATA BASES; CONSULTING RELATING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER FILES, COMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 8, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 22, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance