USPTO serial 75606776
MIGHTY MO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIGHTY MO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Rowan
DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.1100 NORTH GLEBE ROAD 8TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL KEY RINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING SCREEN SAVERS, MOUSEPADS, VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING THE USS MISSOURI BATTLESHIP, AUDIO CASSETTES FEATURING THE USS MISSOURI BATTLESHIP, PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS, AND MAGNETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | NON-MONETARY COINS AND JEWELRY, NAMELY, LAPEL PINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKS FEATURING THE USS MISSOURI BATTLESHIP, PENS, ADDRESS BOOKS, NOTEPADS, PAPERWEIGHTS, AND LETTER OPENERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | COFFEE CUPS, MUGS, DRINKING GLASSES, SHOT GLASSES, INSULATING SLEEVE HOLDERS FOR BEVERAGE CANS, AND COMMEMORATIVE PLATES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATERS, POLO SHIRTS, BASEBALL CAPS, SHORTS, TANK TOPS, JACKETS, VISORS AND DRESS SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | PATCHES FOR CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GOLF BALLS AND CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by USS Missouri Memorial Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by USS Missouri Memorial Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MIGHTY MO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |