Drawing for MICRO SHAPES

USPTO serial 75606813

MICRO SHAPES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO SHAPES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Otto O. Lee

OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GRP LLP12 S 1ST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglasses, eyeglass frames and sunglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 30, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 12, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance