USPTO serial 75607074
ADMTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADMTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hsinchu, TW
Hsinchu, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Berns
MICHAEL BERNS MALONEY PARKINSON & BERNS135 W MAIN STURBANA, IL 61801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer products, namely central processing units, programmed data-carrying electronic circuits for communications and signaling, peripherals for computers, semi-conductor elements, namely, integrated circuits, electronic circuits and communications devices, namely, network interface cards, hubs, and switches | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |