USPTO serial 75607166
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
10051 Ivrea (TO), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. French
TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS FOR REGISTERING, TRANSMITTING, REPRODUCING DATA, DOCUMENTS, SOUNDS AND IMAGES; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS-- NAMELY, MULTIMEDIA PLATFORMS FOR IP TELEPHONY, WEB CALL CENTERS, MULTIMEDIA WEB HOSTING, COMPUTER TELEPHONY INTEGRATION, AND OTHER VIDEO/VOICE APPLICATIONS; NETWORK COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FIELD AND TO MANAGE COMPUTER | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |