Drawing for VENETIAN BLUE TOPAZ

USPTO serial 75607175

VENETIAN BLUE TOPAZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENETIAN BLUE TOPAZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manny D. Pokotilow

MANNY D POKOTILOW C/O CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JEWELRY MADE IN WHOLE OR SUBSTANTIAL PART OF TOPAZACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 24, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 21, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 15, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance