USPTO serial 75607544
SIMPLE ABUNDANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLE ABUNDANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NED T. HIMMELRICH
NED T HIMMELRICH GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, ET ALTHE GARRETT BLDG233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, playing cards; date books; calendars; note pads; stationery; bookbinding materials, namely, cloth for bookbinding, bookbinding tape and bookbinding wire; mounted and unmounted photographs; artists' materials, namely, paintbrushes, arts and craft paints kits, pastels, pencils, pens, and drawing paper; office requisites, namely, pens, pencils, and paperweights; and printed instructional and teaching materials, syndicated newspaper columns, magazines and newsletters, fiction books and non-fiction books, all featuring inspirational, spirituality, personal development, self-fulfillment, self-help, self-analysis, heritage, ethnicity, cultural traditions and customs, women's studies, and motivational topics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |