USPTO serial 75607854
ROCKETTALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKETTALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FULLERTON, CA
FULLERTON, CA
American Digital Telecommunications Corporation
Fullerton, CA
Other trademarks owned by American Digital Telecommunications Corporation
FULLERTON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | general purpose communications connectivity software used to establish or manage connections to electronic communications networks for the transmission of voice, audio, video, or textual data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications services, namely, transmission for others of digitized and compressed graphics, digitized and compressed graphics, digitized and compressed voice, digitized and compressed audio, and digitized and compressed video data via electronic communications networks; webcasting graphic, voice, audio and video programming for others via electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | digitizing graphics, voice, audio and video data for others for transmission via electronic communications networks; compressing graphics, voice, audio and video data for others for transmission via electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKETTALK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKETTALK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by American Digital Telecommunications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKETTALK, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ROCKETTALK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |