USPTO serial 75607895
INTERQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DARWIN NETWORKS ACQUISITION CORP.
Louisville, KY
DARWIN NETWORKS ACQUISITION CORP.
Louisville, KY
InterQuest Communications, Inc.
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Scully
JENNIFER L SCULLY FOSTER PEPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-2605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; electronic mail services | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DARWIN NETWORKS ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by DARWIN NETWORKS ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by InterQuest Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named INTERQUEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |