USPTO serial 75608040
CORE KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORE KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary M. Luria
MARY M LURIA DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed educational materials, namely, a series of booklets, newsletters, pamphlets and articles related to curriculum development in grades K-12 | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services in the nature of workshops featuring consultation in the field of curriculum development in grades K-12 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION
- Other trademarks owned by CORE KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CORE KNOWLEDGE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |