USPTO serial 75608051
GARDENBURGER SANTA FE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2000
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GARDENBURGER SANTA FE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
WHOLESOME & HEARTY FOODS COMPANY
IRVINE, CA
BATTLE CREEK, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie E. Reitz
Julie E. Reitz Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT SUBSTITUTES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gardenburger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gardenburger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gardenburger, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WHOLESOME & HEARTY FOODS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by KELLOGG NORTH AMERICA COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named GARDENBURGER SANTA FE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 28, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |