USPTO serial 75608336
IVYWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IVYWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MALCOLM MCCALEB, JR.
MALCOLM MCCALEB JR BARACK, FERRAZZANO, KIRSCHBAUM ET AL333 W WACKER DRSTE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet, for data entry and word processing to fill out stored templates, and for use in research and query of information sources, all in the field of college and university admission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |